Kazaa Loses in Australian File-Sharing Case
First, the decision [rtf].
Bloomberg reports:
[Content removed on Sept. 8, 20005.]
In a post well worth a full read, Weatherall's Law compares Kazaa to Grokster:
Sept. 4, 2005 - Australian Judge to Rule in Kazaa Case Tomorrow.
Apr. 24, 2005 - File Sharers' Parents Plan to Sue Kazaa.
Mar. 22, 2005 - Final Arguments Begin in Kazaa Lawsuit.
Mar. 7, 2005 - Kazaa's Assets Frozen in Australia.
Bloomberg reports:
An Australian court ruled today that Internet file-sharing operator Kazaa infringed the country's copyright laws and it ordered the company to install filters to prevent future violations.Financial Times writes:
After an 18-month trial, the Federal Court of Australia ruled that Kazaa violated Australian copyright law by authorizing users to infringe music companies' copyright in recordings.
The ruling ordered Sharman Networks to filter out copyrighted material from its Kazaa Media Desktop software within months or face closure. . . .Silicon Valley Media Law Blog summarizes the key facts that the court relied on to support its conclusion.
In his judgement Murray Wilcox, Australian federal court judge, said: "Both the user who makes the file available and the user who downloads a copy infringes the owner's copyright."
[Content removed on Sept. 8, 20005.]
In a post well worth a full read, Weatherall's Law compares Kazaa to Grokster:
In Grokster, the US Supreme Court had to decide whether the 9th Circuit was right to uphold a trial judge's decision granting summary judgment to Grokster and other P2P software providers. . . .And finally, Michael Geist weighs in with the Canadian perspective:
Unlike Grokster, however, Kazaa is a judgment after a full trial. [Kazaa] is a final judgment on liability - subject to any appeal (to the Full Federal Court, or, following that, to the High Court).
From a Canadian perspective, the case highlights a growing divergence between Canadian and Australian copyright law such that the outcome of a similar case in Canada could potentially be much different . . . .Prior posts:
[U]nder Canadian law, Kazaa would be entitled to presume that its services are being used lawfully consistent with its legal terms. Could the music industry rebut the presumption against a Canadian Kazaa? Hard to say.
Sept. 4, 2005 - Australian Judge to Rule in Kazaa Case Tomorrow.
Apr. 24, 2005 - File Sharers' Parents Plan to Sue Kazaa.
Mar. 22, 2005 - Final Arguments Begin in Kazaa Lawsuit.
Mar. 7, 2005 - Kazaa's Assets Frozen in Australia.
