The EEJD Blog

Where Law and Technology Intersect™

Home | EEJD Blog Archives | EEJD: April 2005 Archives

Intellectual Property Publications by Firm  

Below is a list of links to various IP publications, sorted by firm. Only firms that publish regularly on IP are included.

Publications include newsletters, reports, articles, and case summaries.

I update this post periodically. If you have a link that you think should be on the list or an idea to improve this page, let me know.

Baker Botts IP Report (Monthly)
Banner & Witcoff IP Articles
Brinks Hofer IP Publications
Brooks Kushman IP Publications
DLA Piper Rudnick IP Publications
Faegre & Benson IP Publications
Fenwick & West IP Publications
Fernandez & Associates IP Articles
Finnegan Henderson IP Publications
Fish & Richardson CAFC Summary Service (Bi-Weekly)
Fitzpatrick Cella IP Publications
Foley & Lardner IP Publications
Gordon & Glickson IP/Technology Publications
Hiscock & Barclay IP Report (Monthly)
Hunton & Williams IP Publications
I/P Updates Weekly Email
Jones Day IP Publications
Kilpatrick Stockton IP Publications
Leydig Voit IP Newsletter (Quarterly)
McDermott Will & Emery IP Articles
McDermott Will & Emery IP Newsletter (Monthly)
Morrison Foerster IP Publications
Pillsbury Winthrop IP Publications
Rader Fishman IP Newsletter (Monthly)
Stern Kessler Goldstein Fox IP Publications
Woodcock Washburn IP Publications

(last updated: Tuesday, August 23, 2005)

More on Boyle's Deconstructing Stupidity  

There has been a good amount of buzz on Boyle's recent article Deconstructing Stupidity in the Financial Times.

LilBambi links to some earlier writings of Boyle that she finds particularly prescient:
You realize right away that this was an old piece when James Boyle starts talking about Windows 95. But what he has to say in this piece is absolutely dead right nearly 10 years before [what is happening today.]
Prior post: Boyle Deconstructs the Culture of IP Stupidity (Apr. 22, 2005).

Intellectual Property Merit Badge for Scouts  

Scouts in Hong Kong will soon have the opportunity to earn an IP merit badge.

Hong Kong News reports:
The programme, co-organised by the Scout Association, Customs & Excise Department, Motion Picture Association and the Intellectual Property society, aims to provide copyright protection training to various levels of scouts from age seven to 65. . . .

Intellectual Property Rights Scout Badges will be presented to the qualified scout attendees who have completed the programme.

Scout Association Chief Commissioner Pau Shiu-hung said the programme will enhance scouts' respect and knowledge in copyright protection, while Invention Association Chairman Cheung King-fung said it will foster youngsters' respect for creativity and give support to budding inventors.
More: Scout Association of Hong Kong.

Update (May 3, 2005): More at Techdirt and Slashdot.

PowerDsine Brings Patent Suit Against Red Hawk  

Yahoo! Finance reports:
PowerDsine Ltd. . . ., a pioneer in Power over Ethernet (PoE) solutions, announced today that it has filed a suit against Belden CDT Inc. and its subsidiary Red Hawk Network Essentials, Inc.

PowerDsine commenced an action before the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleging that certain products manufactured and sold by Belden CDT and Red Hawk infringe PowerDsine's U.S. Patent No. 6,473,608.
More: U.S. Patent No. 6,473,608 (freepatentsonline - pdf - 3.7M) ("Structure cabling system").

More: PowerDsine and Red Hawk.

Microsoft, Intel Build Up Patent Portfolios  

TechWeb News reports.

Politics of Digital Copyright Debate at Cornell University  

On April 14, 2005, Cornell Univerity hosted a debate titled the Politics of Digital Copyright.

Video and audio is available at the website.

Panelists included:
Siva Vaidhyanathan, Professor of Communications, NYU

Fritz Attaway, Executive VP and general counsel, Motion Picture Association of America

Avery Kotler, Senior director, Business and Legal Affairs Napster

Cary Sherman, President, Recording Industry Association of America

Fred von Lohmann, Senior staff attorney, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Alec French, Senior counsel, Government Relations, NBC/Universal
Boing Boing called it the Copyfight Debate of the Century.

Creative Commons License for Star Wars?  

Slate tells George Lucas that he should put a Creative Commons license on the Star Wars franchise.

I'm not sure if Lucas would be up for that, but it appears that Creative Commons could get behind the idea.

More: About Creative Commons license.

Antitrust Issues in Bundling Software  

Braden Cox at Technology Liberation Front highlights an article he wrote recently titled One Bundle, Many Antitrust Laws: The Dilemma for Digital Products [pdf].

Some questions Cox looks at:
Why bundle digital products? What are the consumer and regulatory misunderstandings toward technology bundling? What is tying, legally speaking? What’s the international impact?

HP Wins $48.5M Deal with EU for Border Control and Police Information System  

HP announces:
HP today announced that it has signed a $48.5 million contract with the European Commission in consortium with Steria to develop two important central information systems, the second generation of the Schengen Information System (SIS II) and the Visa Information System (VIS).

The SIS is the largest border control and police information system in the world and the development of SIS II is an important precondition for the lifting of border controls between current members of the Schengen area and the 10 member states that acceded to the European Union in May 2004. The VIS will manage visa requests for entry to European countries of the Schengen area.
The Inquirer spins the story another way in HP Gets the Nod to Build Massive EU Snooping System:
Hewlett Packard said has got the nod to build a $48.5 million computer system that will keep tabs on European citizens.

The Wired 40 and the Silicon 60: Top Companies in Technology and Innovation  

Wired Magazine presents the Wired 40:
They're masters of technology and innovation. They're global thinkers driven by strategic vision. They're nimbler than Martha Stewart's PR team. They're The Wired 40.
The top 10 of the Wired 40 include:
1. Apple Computer
2. Google
3. Samsung Electronics
4. Amazon.com
5. Yahoo!
6. Electronic Arts
7. Genentech
8. Toyota
9. Infosys Technologies
10. eBay
EE Times presents the EE Times 60 Emerging Startups:
[E]ditors have selected companies based on a mix of criteria including: technology, intended market, maturity, financial position and investment profile. Startups on the Silicon 60 list include companies involved in semiconductors, fab equipment, packaging, foundry, materials, MEMS and EDA software that made an impression.
Interesting group of companies.

Interview with Myhrvold on Patents, Invention, and Intellectual Ventures  

CNet interviews Nathan Myhrvold about his IP company Intellectual Ventures:
Combining the disciplines of a venture capital firm, a think tank and an intellectual-property firm, the company gathers well-known inventors for "invention sessions," hoping the get-togethers will one day result in hugely profitable patents. . . . Myhrvold sees the company as a forum where brilliant minds will have the room and luxury to simply create.

But critics take a dimmer view of the venture. They say it will encourage patent litigation and, paradoxically, discourage innovation.
Interesting interview, check it out.

Update (Apr. 30, 2005): More at Slashdot.

HP Attempts to Patent RDF?  

bopuc/weblog views this patent application as "very very very bad."

The patent application, titled "Semantic File System," was filed in September 2003 by Hewlett Packard Co., and published earlier this month.

CaptSolo interprets the application this way:
Basically, that is a patent for RDF applied to a file system - where subject and (optionally) object may identify objects stored in a file system. . . .

[T]his is a patent for what has been out there for some time - Resource Description Framework (RDF) - a main building block of the Semantic Web.
More: Primer on RDF.

Report: Wireless 3G Patent Licensing Fees Could Stifle Mobile Phone Industry  

Electricnews.net reports:
A new report has warned that royalties related to 3G patents could seriously hurt smaller players in the mobile industry and stifle development of products. . . .

[The report by Informa Telecoms and Media] says that if other main patent holders such as Nokia, Motorola and Ericsson don't license their patents at a similar level to Qualcomm, it will lead to a rise in the cost of the basic technologies required to produce 3G mobile devices.
3G patent royalty rates have apparently been an on-going issue for several years now.

More: 3G Patent Platform.

Update:
More at mobilepipeline ("3G Patents Could Strangle Device Innovation: Report").

Update: (Apr. 29, 2005): More at Patent Prospector.

Symbol Brings New Patent Suit Against Intermec Over Bar Code Technology  

Symbol Technologies announces:
Symbol Technologies . . . today announced that it has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Intermec Technologies Corp. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin, relates to Intermec's infringement of Symbol patents regarding the decoding of Reduced Space Symbology (RSS)-14 stacked bar codes and PDF417 two-dimensional bar codes.
This is not the first patent suit brought by Symbol against Intermec (see prior posts below).

Prior posts: Intermec Responds and Files Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Suit Against Symbol Technologies (Mar. 24, 2005) and Symbol Filed Patent Infringement Suit Against Intermec Relating to 802.11 (or Wi-Fi) Wireless Communication Standard Technologies (Mar. 12, 2005).

Dudas Statement Before the House Subcommittee on IP: Post-Grant Review  

Statement of the Hon. Jon W. Dudas [pdf], Dir. of the USPTO, before the House Subcommittee on IP today.

Dudas focused on the USPTO's post-grant review proposal. Below are a few highlights.

On the value of IP to the United States:
Today, economic success depends increasingly on intangible, information-based assets, such as the creativity of employees and the knowledge gained from research. As a result, intellectual property-based industries, such as biotechnology and entertainment, now represent the largest single sector of the U.S. economy. In fact, IP industries export more American value to the world than the automobile, automobile parts, agricultural, and aircraft industries combined.
On the Post-Grant Review:
As part of our Strategic Plan, we proposed a legislative initiative – Post-Grant Review – to address patent quality, as well as the badly needed patent litigation reform that is being advocated in many quarters. . . .

The USPTO proposal would give the public one year from the day a patent issues to petition for review of that patent. . . .

The USPTO has also proposed that after the first year a person who has been threatened on the basis of a patent be able to challenge that patent in post-grant review. . . .

The USPTO proposal allows the Office to examine every aspect of patentability (e.g., novelty (§ 102), non-obviousness (§ 103), written description (§ 112, paragraph 1)), while leaving equitable considerations largely for the U.S. district courts. . . .
Prior post: Update on House Subcommittee on IP Oversight Hearing on Patents.

Free DRM Article Collection - Volume I of INDICARE Monitor  

CoCo provides a Free Must-Have DRM Article Collection.

The collection consists of Volume I of the INDICARE Monitor [pdf - 2.2M].

More about INDICARE:
The overall goal of INDICARE is to raise awareness, help to reconcile heterogeneous interests of multiple players, and to support the emergence of a common European position with regard to consumer and user issues of Digital Rights Management (DRM) solutions. . . .

INDICARE addresses problems pointed out in the eContent work programme 2003-2004: "There has been little attention to the consumer side of managing rights. Questions remain open as to the level of consumer acceptability of rights management solutions." . . . In addition to consumer issues INDICARE will address the user side, in particular concerns of creators and small and medium-sized information providers.
More: INDICARE blog.

CDT on the Family Movie Act  

The Center for Democracy & Technology offers a CDT Analysis of S. 167, Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005 [pdf].

On the Family Movie Act, the CDT writes:
CDT has long argued that the best way to protect children from inappropriate content is to empower parents with the right tools. In addition, in CDT’s view it is entirely appropriate to permit consumers to exercise this type of voluntary control over their personal use of lawfully obtained copyrighted material. . . . The final version of the legislation succeeds in narrowly confirming the legality of one specific type of device or service, without addressing in any way the legality of other types.
Hat tip: beSpacific.

Prior post: Crawford on the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act.

Update: Brainwagon writes of the technology legalized by the FMA:
The existance of such technologies does nothing to decrease the sales of [the movie studios'] products: in fact, if anything it should have a positive effect. They instead choose to complain that the "integrity" of the movies they produce will be harmed. Yes, the integrity of Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle will be harmed when the references to sex and drugs are dropped. What a pity. Perhaps the sounds of cash registers will help alleviate their inner angst.

More on Bill Gates Speaking About IP at the Library of Congress  

Patrick Ross has more on Bill Gates speaking about IP at the Library of Congress this week.

Prior post: Gates: Get Rid of the H-1B Visa Caps (Apr. 27, 2005).

Crawford on the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act  

Walt Crawford, in the lastest issue of Cites & Insights, writes on the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005 in an article titled FMA: Watching the Way You Want. It is well worth the read.

Crawford starts with an overview of the legislation, and then summarizes the commentary, primarily on the Family Movie Act from the likes of Wired News, Freedom to Tinker, Digital Koans, and Infothought.

Crawford also includes an interesting discussion on Moral Rights. The discussion is general in nature, however, as to DVD's, Crawford writes:
Once I’ve purchased a copy of your DVD, you have no moral right to prevent me from watching it in the manner I prefer.
Hat tip: commons-blog.

Prior post: More Family Movie Act Commentary (Apr. 23, 2005).

Update on House Subcommittee on IP Oversight Hearing on Patents  

The House Subcommittee on IP held an Oversight Hearing on the Committee Print Regarding Patent Quality Improvement today.

Matt Buchanan at Promote the Progress writes about what was discussed, but was not in the Committee Print:
In particular, Representative Boucher initiated a discussion on the need for a procedure that allows third parties to submit relevant art to the Patent Office during examination.
Read on for more of what was said, as well as Buchanan's proposed solution: "the prior art wiki".

Buchanan also provides two other quick takes from the hearing.

Prior post: House Subcommitte on IP Oversight Hearing on Patent Quality Improvement (Part II) (April 27, 2005).

Update (Apr. 29, 2005): Buchanan has now added pdf versions of witness' prepared testimony.

European Governments Follow Google's Lead, Propose the European Digital Library  

At the end of 2004, Google announced:
. . . that it is working with the libraries of Harvard, Stanford, the University of Michigan, and the University of Oxford as well as The New York Public Library to digitally scan books from their collections so that users worldwide can search them in Google.
France was not too happy with this development:
FRANCE'S national library has raised a "war cry" over plans by Google to put books from some of the world's great libraries on the internet.

Jean-Noel Jeanneney, who heads France's national library and is a noted historian, says Google's choice of works is likely to favour Anglo-Saxon ideas and the English language.
So now, Europe follows Google's lead:
Six European leaders jointly proposed Thursday that works contained in European libraries be made accessible online, in what they called a "European digital library."
More: Google Library.

Prior post: Googlephobia in France (Apr. 3, 2005).

Update: Ars Technica is skeptical Europe will succeed:
This has all the looks of another Internet versus Minitel, the French national information network, and it will likely see the same fate: irrelevancy.

Spitzer Sues Over Spyware  

Yahoo! News reports:
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer sued a major Internet marketer Thursday, blaming it for secretly installing software that delivers nuisance pop-up advertisements and can slow and crash personal computers. . . .

Spitzer accuses Intermix of redirecting computer users to Web sites where ads get displayed, adding unnecessary toolbars to Web browsers and delivering unwanted ads that pop up on computer screens.
More: Intermix.

Update: Andrew Raff links to the documents in the case.

More: EFF ("Spitzer Suit Shows the Right Way to Fight Spyware").

New York Promotes Broadband Action Plan  

Lightwave reports:
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has announced a comprehensive plan to improve New York City's telecommunications infrastructure while spurring the growth of telecommunications business in the city.

The plan, "Telecommunications and Economic Development in New York City: A Plan for Action," is a collaborative effort of New York City's Economic Development Corporation (EDC), its Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications (DoITT), and its Department of Small Business Services (SBS).
More: A Plan for Action [pdf].

More: New York City Economic Development Corporation.

Hat tip: Om Malik.

Bush Recognizes Importance of Technology in Addressing Energy Problems  

Energy policy is not a focus of the EEJD blog, however, President Bush spent most of his speech today discussing technology policy, and how it will play a critical role in addressing our current energy problems.

From President Bush's speech:
Technology is allowing us to better use our existing energy resources. And in the years ahead, technology will allow us to create entirely new sources of energy in ways earlier generations could never dream. Technology is the ticket, is this nation's ticket to greater energy independence. . . .

[T]he most important component of our strategy is to recognize the transformational power of technology. Over the last quarter century, technology has radically changed the way we live and work. . . .

I believe the next 25 years the changes are going to be even more dramatic. Our country is on the doorstep of incredible technological advances that will make energy more abundant and more affordable for our citizens. By harnessing the power of technology, we're going to be able to grow our economy, protect our environment, and achieve greater energy independence.
On nuclear power:
Today's technology has made nuclear power safer, cleaner, and more efficient than ever before. Nuclear power is now providing about 20 percent of America's electricity, with no air pollution or greenhouse gas emissions. . . .

America has not ordered a new nuclear power plant since the 1970s. France, by contrast, has built 58 plants in the same period.
On oil refineries:
Technology has allowed us to better control emissions and improve the efficiency and environmental performance of our existing refineries. Yet there have been no new oil refineries built in the United States since 1976. And existing refineries are running at nearly full capacity.
On oil and natural gas exploration:
Advances in technology will also allow us to open up new areas to environmentally responsible exploration for oil and natural gas, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. . . . Technology now makes it possible to reach ANWR's hydrocarbons by drilling on just 2,000 acres of the 19 million acres of land. That's just one-tenth of 1 percent of ANWR's total area. Because of the advances in technology, we can reach the oil deposits with almost no impact on land or local wildlife.
On coal energy:
To make cleaner use of this resource, I have asked Congress for more than $2 billion over 10 years for my coal research initiative. It's a program that will encourage new technologies that remove virtually all pollutants from coal-fired power plants. . . . [W]e must put technology to work so we can harness the power of clean coal.
On new sources of energy, such as hydrogen fuel:
Hydrogen is one of the most promising of these new sources of energy. Two years ago my administration launched a crash program called the Hydrogen Fuel initiative. We've already dedicated $1.2 billion over five years to this effort to develop hydrogen-powered fuel cells. We know that when hydrogen is used in the fuel cell it has the power to -- potential to power anything from a cell phone to a computer to an automobile; that it emits pure water, instead of exhaust fumes.
On hydrogen cars:
I've asked Congress for an additional $500 million over five years to help move advanced technology vehicles from the research lab to the dealership lot. . . . To help produce fuel for these cars, my administration has also launched a Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative, an effort to develop advanced nuclear technologies that can produce hydrogen fuels for cars and trucks. . . .

[W]e're developing new technologies that will change the way we drive. . . . We need to get on a path away from the fossil fuel economy. If we want to be less dependent on foreign sources of energy, we must develop new ways to power automobiles.
On renewable fuel:
We can produce another renewable fuel, bodies, from leftover fats and vegetable oils. . . . Ethanol and biodiesel have got great potential. And that's why I've supported a flexible, cost-effective renewable fuel standard as part of the energy bill.
On wind and solar power:
Technology can also help us tap into a vital source that flows around us all the time and that is wind. That's why I've asked Congress to provide $1.9 billion over 10 years for tax incentives for renewable energy technologies like wind, as well as residential solar heating systems and energy produced from landfill gas and biomass.
On energy conservation in the home:
Already, technology is helping us grow our economy while using less energy. . . .

Technological advances are helping develop new products that give our consumers the same and even better performance at lower cost by using less energy. . . .

We can imagine a day when technologies like solar panels, high-efficiency appliances, and advanced installation will allow us to build zero-energy homes that produce as much energy as they consume. That's the promise that technology holds for us all.
On energy conservation in automobiles:
Hybrid vehicles are one of the most promising technologies immediately available to consumers. . . . And their electronic systems are paving the way for tomorrow's hydrogen-powered vehicles.

We're encouraging automakers to produce a new generation of modern, clean diesel cars and trucks. My administration has issued new rules that will remove more than 90 percent of the sulfur in diesel fuel by 2010. . . . We've proposed $2.5 billion over 10 years in tax credits that will encourage consumers to buy energy-efficient hybrid cars and trucks, and we need to expand these incentives to include clean diesel vehicles, as well.
On power delivery:
[T]echnology will help us deliver it more efficiently. New technologies such as superconducting power lines can help us bring our electrical grid into the 21st century, and protect American families and businesses from damaging power outages.
And in conclusion:
We must become less dependent. And there's no doubt in my mind that technology is going to help us achieve that objective.
Update (May 1, 2005): A thorough fisking of the speech (Apr. 29, 2005) from Trolling in Shallow Water.

Baker Botts IP Report: Using Your Patent Portfolio to Defend Against a Patent Infringement Suit  

Baker Botts publishes a nice Intellectual Property Report every month.

In this month's report, Paula Heyman writes an interesting article titled Using Your Patent Portfolio To Defend Against A Patent Infringement Suit.

Heyman writes:
Companies, both big and small, are facing ever-growing threats of patent assertion and litigation, and many consumer product and services companies, even those who have not previously regarded themselves as vulnerable to assertion of third-party patents, will need to become accustomed to being presumptive targets of increasingly-aggressive patentees. However, there are certain steps that companies may be able to take in order either to prevent a patent infringement suit from being filed or to be better prepared to put on a successful defense.
Heyman goes on to explain what companies can do, and answers a couple of specific questions:
Should The Company, If Accused Of Infringement, Bring A Counterclaim Of Infringement Against The Third-Party Patent Asserter?

Should An Interference Be Provoked In The USPTO Between One Of The Company’s Pending Patent Applications And The Opposing Party’s Patent?

Should The Company Consider Reexamination Of Its Patents?

Epson Brings Patent Suit Against Armor Group, Expands Suit Against Multi-Union Trading  

Epson's press release:
Epson has filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Portland, Ore., against the Armor Group, manufacturers and distributors of aftermarket ink cartridges . . . . The lawsuit by Epson . . . alleges that at least 30 models of replacement ink jet cartridges for Epson Stylus printers manufactured by Artech GmbH infringe Epson's patents. . . .

In a separate development, Epson filed a second patent infringement lawsuit to add at least 49 more cartridge models to its patent infringement lawsuit brought in April 2001 against Multi-Union Trading Company Ltd., a Hong-Kong-based company that is one of the world's largest suppliers of aftermarket ink cartridges.
More: Armor Group.

Prior posts: Epson's Patent Suit Against Multi Union Trading: Judge Denies Preliminary Injunction and Trial Moves Forward on Patent Invalidity Defenses (Mar. 17, 2005) and Epson Wins in Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Multi-Union Trading (Mar. 10, 2005).

Update (Apr. 28, 2005): Multi-Union responds:
Multi-Union Trading Company understands that Seiko Epson has filed a complaint alleging patent infringement against us and another U.S.-based company. Multi-Union believes that this latest filing is an effort by Seiko Epson to secure leverage in existing litigation between the parties. The complaint has not, however, been properly served. If Seiko Epson serves the complaint, Multi-Union will instruct its attorneys to analyze the allegations and underlying patents. We will then respond appropriately.

We have strenuously resisted the claims of Seiko Epson in another case and are preparing to go to trial to challenge the validity of the patents Seiko Epson asserted in that case. We are determined to do everything within lawful bounds to protect our legal rights and the rights of consumers.
More: Multi Union Trading Co..

High Tech DTV Coalition: Free the DTV Spectrum  

Patrick Ross at the Progress and Freedom Foundation discusses the newly formed High Tech DTV Coalition and its urging of the release of the 700MHz DTV spectrum.

House Subcommitte on IP Oversight Hearing on Patent Quality Improvement (Part II)  

The House Subcommittee on IP is having its second Oversight Hearing on the Committee Print Regarding Patent Quality Improvement.

Date: Thursday, Apr. 28, 2005
Time: 12:00PM

Committee Print [pdf].

A live webcast is available at the link above.

Witnesses include:
Hon. Jon W. Dudas
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Richard Levin
President, Yale University

Dr. Nathan P. Myhrvold
Chief Executive Officer, Intellectual Ventures

Darin E. Bartholomew
Senior Attorney, Patent Department, John Deere and Company on behalf of the Financial Services Roundtable
More: House Oversight Hearing (Part I), Learnings from House Subcommittee Hearing on the Draft Patent Statute (Apr. 21, 2005) and Draft Patent Statute: House Subcommittee Proposing Changes in Patent Law (Apr. 19, 2005).

Hynix, Rambus Patent Infringement Suit Moves Forward  

The TimesLeader.com reports (Bloomberg):
A federal judge Monday denied Hynix Semiconductor's bid to dismiss a patent-infringement lawsuit filed by Rambus over designs for high-speed computer memory chips.

U.S. District Judge Ronald Whyte in San Jose declined to adopt findings used by a federal judge in Virginia to dismiss a similar suit Los Altos chip designer Rambus filed against Infineon Technologies. Monday's order followed Whyte's tentative ruling last week denying Hynix's request to dismiss the case.

More on French Court's Ban on DRM  

Patently-O has the latest, including an English version of the court's opinion in pdf.

Prior post: French Court Bans DRM? (Apr. 26, 2005 - including links to a number of commentaries).